BL Blog

Kill the Background: How to Turn a Background Black with Speedlights

Tips & Tricks
Chiaroscuro Portraits by Alex Huff

Chiaroscuro Portraits by Alex Huff

I was recently inspired by a recent series of portraits by our very own Alex Huff. Titled “Chiaroscuro Portraiture,” it features these gorgeous close-up portraits of the men and women in her life, each one of which is a study in how to render the interplay between light and shadow.

Alex takes these images in front of a grey background, and through a combination of getting in close to her subjects and using one light, sends what little you might see of that grey to almost pitch black. I began to think of what I could do if I didn’t have a backdrop to shoot against, if I needed to make a portrait in a relatively brightly-lit area. In theory, it could be done; a basic understanding of the Inverse-Square Law reveals that much.

But what if all you had was a basic modifier and a couple of speedlights, not a big studio strobe? Could you still do it? I had to give it a try.

The Lobby

The Lobby

I picked the area above to try this out in. That’s the lobby of the West Coast headquarters in San Carlos, CA. As you can tell, it’s a pretty bright area, with large glass windows letting in a lot of ambient light, grey walls with photos mounted, a television and a glass case in the corner. Not exactly an “uncluttered” background, but it made for a great area for a test case.

I roped in a couple of guys from our front-desk team, who’ve been long-suffering models for my various experiments, to be my portrait subjects.

I started with taking a test exposure. I knew I wanted to kill the ambient light completely, so I took a test shot at a shutter speed of 1/250th at f/8 at ISO 100, and sure enough, the exposure was completely dark.

Then, I put Andrew Kim in front of the camera with one Nikon SB-910 speedlight in a softbox to his left (camera-right). The box was aimed at a roughly 30-degree angle.



This resulted in the image below.

Andrew Kim, 1/250th at f/8. The background is still visible.

Andrew Kim, 1/250th at f/8. The background is still visible.

Okay – the background is definitely not black. I suspected that the flash was spilling onto the background, but I wondered for a bit if it could possibly be ambient leaking into the image, despite my earlier “dark” shot of the room at the same settings.

So, I decided to give it another go, this time upping my shutter speed (which controls the amount of ambient light in the exposure) to 1/640th and using the SB-910 in Auto-FP (high-speed-sync) mode, which lets you shoot at shutter speeds all the way to 1/8000th on a D800E.

Andrew at 1/640th at f/4. Still lots of light in the background.

Andrew at 1/640th at f/4. Still lots of light in the background.

At this point, it’s pretty obvious that there’s no ambient light leaking into the shot. But what the heck, let’s be totally sure. Here’s the shot at 1/1250th at f/4.

Andrew, at 1/1250th, getting bored with this exercise.

Andrew, at 1/1250th, getting bored with this exercise.

Much darker, but you can still tell that the background isn’t pure black. Also, Andrew is much darker than I’d like. Nothing I can’t fix in post, but I know there’s a way to do this all in-camera. Now I’m certain it’s not the ambient light, so I dial back down to 1/250th and reposition the softbox.

Light source repositioned.

Light source repositioned.

This time, I’m basically feathering the light source away from the background as much as possible, skimming it across Andrew’s face.

Almost there...

Almost there…

Depending on your computer, you may or may not see that the background isn’t yet completely black. True, if I up the contrast in Lightroom just a bit, and tweak it a tad, I’ll have my desired result. But it’s not in-camera, darnit!

So I changed things up. I switched from a Lastolite Ezybox Hotshoe to an Apollo 28″ Softbox with a Lastolite TriFlash. The Triflash lets you put two speedlights like the SB-910’s I use onto a single light stand so you can get an extra stop of power out of it.

With two speedlights in the Apollo, I brought the box in just a bit closer to Andrew, and added one more element to the mix – a reflector on camera-left with its black side facing Andrew. Also known as a “flag,” its purpose was to prevent light from the softbox from caroming around the room. I also upped my aperture from f/8 to f/16, and stepped closer to my subject, increasing the effect of the aforementioned Inverse-Square Law.

Black "flag" on camera-left.

Black “flag” on camera-left.

And the result, at 1/250th, f/16:

Bingo! Andrew, at 1/250th, f/16

Bingo! Andrew, at 1/250th, f/16

That totally did the trick. As you can see, the background is completely black, with rich shadows and soft light creating a very Huffian (as in the aforementioned Alex Huff) portrait.

I brought Ben Salomon, another member of our team, up in front of the camera so I could make sure my setup was replicable.

Ben Salomon

Ben Salomon

Apart from a small retouch on their faces to sort out tone, the above images are pretty-much straight out of camera. As an experiment, I repositioned the softbox a bit to get a nice split-lighting image with Ben as well. I had to “dodge” a tiny gleam out of his right eye that I suspected came from the on-board flash of the D800, which I used to trigger the SB-910s, but that was it.

Ben, split lighting

Ben, split lighting

This experiment is just one way to fade the background to black. There are other ways as well – using an ND filter with large studio strobes, using high-speed sync, etc. Either way, it’s nice to know that with just a couple of speedlights – or just one, if you’re willing to do a minimal amount of post-processing – you can create striking, dramatic portraits regardless of where you are.

And here, for giggles, as an example of the dynamic range that a D800E is capable of capturing, is the image above (Ben Salomon), with the exposure brought up by 4 stops.

Ben, plus 4.

Ben, plus 4.

Um, yeah.

As always, questions and feedback are welcome in the comments below.

Thank you for reading this post. Leave a comment or subscribe to the RSS feed and have future articles delivered right to your feed reader. Love BL? Become an affiliate today!
The following two tabs change content below.
Sohail Mamdani is a writer and photographer based in the San Francisco Bay Area. Follow him on Twitter, Facebook or Google+. You can find his portfolio on his website at as well as on 500px and Flickr.

Latest posts by Sohail Mamdani (see all)


  • Deborah hurd says:

    Awesome. Gonna use this trick in my next maternity shoot. That light is beautiful for pregnant, scantily clad Mommas. :)

  • Very cool, I’ll have to try it out myself. Thanks for sharing.

  • Jeffrey Howarth says:

    I can see the background in ALL of the shots. You need a snoot on the flash.

  • David Martin says:

    Very nice. I will have to try this one of these days.

  • Mark Sandstorm says:

    I like using this [similar] technique in dark club environments where my background is either far away making it less likely to show in the photo or by letting the light fall of more aggressively which gives me the chance to grab my shots of the faces with a tad bit more usable light than shown above.

  • OK, nice work, nice portraits, but we did this as an assignment at school in the 70’s
    with film and 4×5…this isn’t NEW…

    • Peanut says:

      Well if you did in “in the 70’s, with film” then yes this is definitely NEW! But I dont think this piece is saying he discovered something new to the world, just new to him and sharing. Nice piece.

  • I would be interested to see what the original set up (angle and single SB-910 in the flash box) plus the black flag would look like.

  • Reggie says:

    Why didn’t you incorporate the flag before you switched up all the gear you were using? Would be nice to know how much effect just using the flag would have.

  • says:

    Really, it is a great tutorial for black backdrop! What about let us translate into Italian language?

  • chickendiablo says:

    do u mind if i ask what length lens you were working with, also what was the distance between you and your subject and the distance between the subject and the wall?

  • Leave a comment, a question, or show us your work!